ArticleAmerican journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
An Integrated Process for Co-Developing and Implementing Written and Computable Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Article in American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic review of clinical guidance for lipid management in adults with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A global perspective.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Article
- A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
- Development of Computable Guidelines: GIN McMaster Guideline Development Checklist Extension for Computable Guidelines.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Unravelling Education Needs for Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Survey Performed in the Netherlands.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- TRAUMA: making trauma clinical guidance more implementable.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Clinical Algorithms and the Legacy of Race-Based Correction: Historical Errors, Contemporary Revisions and Equity-Oriented Methodologies for Epidemiologists.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Review
- Equitable and effective clinical guidance development and dissemination: trauma aims to lead the way.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
- Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age: Summary of a Holistic and Multidisciplinary Approach.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
- Adapted Kaizen: Multi-Organizational Complex Process Redesign for Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
- An Evaluation Framework for a Novel Process to Codevelop Written and Computable Guidelines.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this article is to describe an integrated parallel process for the co-development of written and computable clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to accelerate adoption and increase the impact of guideline recommendations in clinical practice. From February 2018 through December 2021, interdisciplinary work groups were formed after an initial Kaizen event and using expert consensus and available literature, produced a 12-phase integrated process (IP). The IP includes activities, resources, and iterative feedback loops for developing, implementing, disseminating, communicating, and evaluating CPGs. The IP incorporates guideline standards and informatics practices and clarifies how informaticians, implementers, health communicators, evaluators, and clinicians can help guideline developers throughout the development and implementation cycle to effectively co-develop written and computable guidelines. More efficient processes are essential to create actionable CPGs, disseminate and communicate recommendations to clinical end users, and evaluate CPG performance. Pilot testing is underway to determine how this IP expedites the implementation of CPGs into clinical practice and improves guideline uptake and health outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.