Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37668214›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2023

Facing the phase problem.

Wayne A Hendrickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protein Structure Determination by Racemic and Quasi-Racemic X-Ray Crystallography.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Other Techniques.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. A Bright and Dynamic Future in Structural Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wayne A HendricksonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Funding

Structural Genomics on Membrane ProteinsU54GM095315 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI ROST, BURKHARD · 2010 to 2014
$15.2M
Proposal for an Administrative Supplement for Equipment Purchases for NIGMS Awardees NOT-GM-18-022R01GM107462 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HENDRICKSON, WAYNE A. · 2014 to 2021
$3.6M
ANOMALOUS-SCATTERING STUDIES OF MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURER37GM034102 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HENDRICKSON, WAYNE A. · 1994 to 2003
$1.4M
ANOMALOUS-SCATTERING STUDIES OF PROTEIN STRUCTURER01GM034102 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HENDRICKSON, WAYNE A. · 1985 to 2008
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marvel of X-ray crystallography is the beauty and precision of the atomic structures deduced from diffraction patterns. Since these patterns record only amplitudes, phases for the diffracted waves must also be evaluated for systematic structure determination. Thus, we have the phase problem as a central complication, both intellectually for the field and practically so for many analyses. Here, I discuss how we - myself, my laboratory and the diffraction community - have faced the phase problem, considering the evolution of methods for phase evaluation as structural biology developed to the present day. During the explosive growth of macromolecular crystallography, practice in diffraction analysis evolved from a universal reliance on isomorphous replacement to the eventual domination of anomalous diffraction for de novo structure determination. As the Protein Data Bank (PDB) grew and familial relationships among proteins became clear, molecular replacement overtook all other phasing methods; however, experimental phasing remained essential for molecules without obvious precedents, with multi- and single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD and SAD) predominating. While the mathematics-based direct methods had proved to be inadequate for typical macromolecules, they returned to crack substantial selenium substructures in SAD analyses of selenomethionyl proteins. Native SAD, exploiting the intrinsic S and P atoms of biomolecules, has become routine. Selenomethionyl SAD and MAD were the mainstays of structural genomics efforts to populate the PDB with novel proteins. A recent dividend has been paid in the success of PDB-trained artificial intelligence approaches for protein structure prediction. Currently, molecular replacement with AlphaFold models often obviates the need for experimental phase evaluation. For multiple reasons, we are now unfazed by the phase problem. Cryo-EM analysis is an attractive alternative to crystallography for many applications faced by today's structural biologists. It simply finesses the phase problem; however, the principles and procedures of diffraction analysis remain pertinent and are adopted in single-particle cryo-EM studies of biomolecules.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExplosive AgentsCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinGenomicsExplosive Agentsanomalous diffractiondensity modificationdirect methodsisomorphous replacementmolecular replacement

Identifiers

PMID37668214
PMCPMC10478523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.