Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37668193›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2024

The potential role of mechanotransduction in the management of pediatric calvarial bone flap repair.

Hanna Anderson, David S Hersh, Yusuf Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna AndersonBiomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
David S HershDepartment of Surgery, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Yusuf KhanBiomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3792-3477

Funding

Transdermal Mechanical Loading for Cell Therapy-Based Bone RepairR01AR073206 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KHAN, YUSUF M · 2018 to 2023
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073206NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric patients suffering traumatic brain injuries may require a decompressive craniectomy to accommodate brain swelling by removing a portion of the skull. Once the brain swelling subsides, the preserved calvarial bone flap is ideally replaced as an autograft during a cranioplasty to restore protection of the brain, as it can reintegrate and grow with the patient during immature skeletal development. However, pediatric patients exhibit a high prevalence of calvarial bone flap resorption post-cranioplasty, causing functional and cosmetic morbidity. This review examines possible solutions for mitigating pediatric calvarial bone flap resorption by delineating methods of stimulating mechanosensitive cell populations with mechanical forces. Mechanotransduction plays a critical role in three main cell types involved with calvarial bone repair, including mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and dural cells, through mechanisms that could be exploited to promote osteogenesis. In particular, physiologically relevant mechanical forces, including substrate deformation, external forces, and ultrasound, can be used as tools to stimulate bone repair in both in vitro and in vivo systems. Ultimately, combating pediatric calvarial flap resorption may require a combinatorial approach using both cell therapy and bioengineering strategies.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionBrain EdemaDecompressive CraniectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresChildHumansMechanotransduction, CellularSurgical Flapsbone resorptiondural cellsmechanotransductionosteoblastspediatricultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37668193
PMCPMC10841298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.