Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37668047›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023

Threatened miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage: Expert opinions on progesterone therapy and treatment challenges.

Süleyman Cansun Demir, Ali Gedikbaşı, Hakan Timur, Cihan Çetin, Halil Gürsoy Pala, Çağrı Gülümser

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Süleyman Cansun DemirÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8331-9559
Ali GedikbaşıPrivate Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4727-0310
Hakan TimurOrdu University Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Perinatology, Ordu, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-4199
Cihan ÇetinBahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9212-1034
Halil Gürsoy PalaUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-4474
Çağrı GülümserAnkara Yüksek İhtisas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-9038
Bahçeşehir University · TRCukurova University · TRIzmir University · TROrdu University · TRTurkish Society of Hematology · TRYüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is crucial to gain a better understanding of threatened and recurrent miscarriages, including the existing knowledge and unknowns, as well as to discuss medical approaches and assess the situation. These issues are outstanding problems, causing significant physical and emotional burdens on women and their families, not only in Turkey but also worldwide. This article aims to explore the topic of miscarriages, including the implications, challenges, and potential therapeutic approaches in Turkey. Nineteen statements were presented to 6 Turkish perinatologists and obstetricians and gynecologists to evaluate the management of threatened and recurrent miscarriage and to compare the results with literature recommendations in an expert opinion meeting. Turkish perinatologists and obstetricians & gynecologists provided their responses using a 5-point Likert scale and discussed every statement. Progesterone use, particularly oral dydrogesterone, was supported by most of the experts. Opinions varied on the preference for dydrogesterone in recurrent miscarriage treatment. Experts unanimously agreed on the efficacy and safety of dydrogesterone and its recommendation in guidelines for threatened and recurrent miscarriage. Regarding progesterone therapy, vaginal progesterone was not associated with an increased rate of live births. Side effects of vaginal and oral micronized progesterone were acknowledged, and compliance with oral progesterone treatment was generally agreed upon. Dydrogesterone activity and effectiveness in threatened miscarriage received positive responses, while opinions on its effectiveness in recurrent miscarriage were divided. The loading dose of dydrogesterone and the practice of checking blood progesterone levels had different opinions among experts.This manuscript provides valuable insights in the management of threatened and recurrent miscarriages, highlighting the role of progesterone therapy, specifically dydrogesterone, and the need for adherence to relevant guidelines. Further research and a national Turkish guideline are warranted to address areas of uncertainty and optimize the management of these conditions.

Indexed as

diagnosisprogesteronerecurrent miscarriageThreatened miscarriagetreatment

Identifiers

PMID37668047
PMCPMC10478724
OpenAlexW4386421914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.