ArticleExpert review of proteomics
Glycobiology and proteomics: has mass spectrometry moved the field forward?
Article in Expert review of proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- GlycoDiveR: A Modular R Framework to Analyze and Visualize Highly Dimensional Glycoproteomics Data.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Methods for Systematic Identification and Quantification of Protein O-Glycosylation in Complex Biological Samples.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Review
- GlycoDiveR: a modular R framework to analyze and visualize highly dimensional glycoproteomics data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Glycan masking in immunogen design: computational and experimental methods.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Mass spectrometry-based methods for investigating the dynamics and organization of the surfaceome: exploring potential clinical implications.Expert review of proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.