Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667857›Full record

ReviewPersonality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc2024

The Intergroup Value Protection Model: A Theoretically Integrative and Dynamic Approach to Intergroup Conflict Escalation in Democratic Societies.

Martijn van Zomeren, Chantal d'Amore, Inga Lisa Pauls, Eric Shuman, Ana Leal

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martijn van ZomerenUniversity of Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-2177
Chantal d'AmoreUniversity of Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7151-3888
Inga Lisa PaulsPhilipps University of Marburg, Germany.
Eric ShumanNew York University, New York City, USA.
Ana LealUniversity of Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLNew York University · USPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

scientific abstractWe review social-psychological evidence for a theoretically integrative and dynamic model of intergroup conflict escalation within democratic societies. Viewing individuals as social regulators who protect their social embeddedness (e.g., in their group or in society), the PUBLIC ABSTRACT: The 2021 Capitol Hill attack exemplifies a major "trigger event" for different groups to protect their values within a democratic society. Which specific perceptions generate such a triggering event, which value-protective responses does it trigger, and do such responses escalate intergroup conflict? We offer the

Indexed as

MoralsSocial IdentificationFearGroup ProcessesHumansIntentioncollective actiondyadic harmemotiongroup psychologyintergroup conflictmoral charactermoralizationmoral psychologypolarizationpunishmentsocial contractsocial identityvalue protection

Identifiers

PMID37667857
PMCPMC11010547
OpenAlexW4386439240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.