Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667774›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023

Evaluation of Guidelines and Consensus on Ectopic Pregnancy Based by AGREE II Method.

Yiran Fu, Weishe Zhang, Qi Wang, Caihong Hu, Qi Li, Jingrui Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiran FuDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Weishe ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Qi WangDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Caihong HuDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Qi LiReproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-795X
Jingrui HuangDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-9302
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the methodological quality of diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus related to ectopic pregnancy. Materials and methods: Use the "Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation" (AGREE II) method to evaluate the differences among the guideline/consensus. Results: We appraised 9 clinical practice guidelines for ectopic pregnancy (9 clinical practice guidelines from 5 countries) including the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, and China. The guidelines received the highest scores for clarity of presentation (82.72%) and lowest scores for editorial independence (30.56%). The comprehensive recommendations of the 7 guidelines were Grade B, the other 2 guidelines were Grade C. Conclusion: The overall quality of the ectopic pregnancy guidelines had room for improvement. It is recommended to supplement and improve the four fields of "independence", "rigor", "participants" and "application", especially the "independence" and "application" fields.

Indexed as

AGREE IIclinical practiceectopic pregnancyguidelinespelvic pain

Identifiers

PMID37667774
PMCPMC10475285
OpenAlexW4386289560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.