ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
An evaluation of risk factors for readmission in patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a Remote Therapeutic Monitoring Device and Integrated Care Platform in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Trial
- Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile of Vancomycin in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Services: A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 2026 Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy delivery, readmission rates, and multidisciplinary teams: a scoping review of the impact of published quality indicators.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Inpatient Cost Avoidance and Uncompensated Labor Associated With Different Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Care Models.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Delivery of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in an Ever-Changing National Health Service (UK): Benefits, Barriers, and Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), when required, is beneficial to patients and healthcare systems by reducing hospital length-of-stay, providing cost savings, and improving patient satisfaction. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine readmission rates and associated risk factors in patients receiving OPAT at home. Methods: This retrospective study included hospitalized patients 15 years and older who were discharged on intravenous antimicrobial therapy Results: Two hundred individual patients were included in the analysis; 60% were male and the mean age was 49 years. The most common indications for OPAT at home were bone and joint infection (52%) and bacteremia (26%). Forty patients (20%) experienced an unplanned, all-cause 30-day readmission, with a total of 48 readmission events. Of the 40 patients who were readmitted within 30 days, 20 (50%) were due to non-OPAT related reasons. Sixty patients (30%) experienced an OPAT-related complication, and chronic kidney disease was found to be an independent predictor of readmission (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.0-7.6). Conclusions: Patients receiving OPAT at home are at increased risk for early hospital readmission, but it is often due to reasons not associated with OPAT. Patients with chronic kidney disease beginning OPAT at home should be closely monitored after discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.