Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667705›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Tolerance to and Postoperative Outcomes With Early Oral Feeding Following Elective Bowel Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Lord Mvoula, Evelyn Irizarry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07016919 (Early vs Conventional Enteral Nutrition After Uncomplicated Paediatric Open appendectomy-a Randomised Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07016919 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Early vs Conventional Enteral Nutrition After Uncomplicated Paediatric Open appendectomy-a Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreRan2025 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsUncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in ChildrenArmsearly enteral nutrition, Conventional enteral nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lord MvoulaSurgery, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, USA.
Evelyn IrizarryColorectal Surgery, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, USA.
Lincoln Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although practice guidelines recommend resuming oral feeding immediately after gastrointestinal surgery, many practitioners remain reluctant to order early oral feeding (EOF). Therefore, this review aimed to clarify the tolerance to and postoperative outcomes with EOF among patients undergoing bowel surgery. A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and July 2022 with the time of oral intake (early or delayed until resolution of ileus) as the exposure variable was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. Outcomes of interest included tolerance to EOF and postoperative adverse effects or complications. After screening 1,667 research articles, 18 randomized control trials, six prospective case series, and four cohort studies met our inclusion criteria, collectively representing data from 2,647 patients in eleven countries. These studies indicate that while most patients tolerate EOF, 5-25% may not tolerate EOF until the fourth postoperative day (POD). Moreover, EOF, at best, has no advantage over delayed feeding in terms of vomiting, nausea, nasogastric tube requirement, or other postoperative complications. In addition, early return of bowel function, lower risk of diarrhea, and lower pain score with EOF are inconsistently reported, and shorter hospitalization with EOF may be limited to those who tolerate oral feeding on POD 0 or 1. Nevertheless, shorter hospitalization with EOF could reduce the cost of hospitalization. A substantial number of patients may not be able to tolerate oral feeding after bowel surgery until POD 4, and in patients who tolerate EOF, the only clear benefit is a shorter length of hospitalization.

Indexed as

dietfeedingintestinemealsmidline incisionnpoopen surgery

Identifiers

PMID37667705
PMCPMC10475250
OpenAlexW4385578954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.