Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667552›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Protein intake in cancer: Does it improve nutritional status and/or modify tumour response to chemotherapy?

Martin Boutière, Cécile Cottet-Rousselle, Céline Coppard, Karine Couturier, Catherine Féart, Morgane Couchet, Christelle Corne, Christophe Moinard, Charlotte Breuillard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Meeting physical activity guidelines in conjunction with higher protein intake: associations with appendicular lean soft tissue index in middle aged adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martin BoutièreUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA), Grenoble, France.
Cécile Cottet-RousselleUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA), Grenoble, France.
Céline CoppardUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CNRS, Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), Grenoble, France.
Karine CouturierUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA), Grenoble, France.
Catherine FéartUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Bordeaux, France.
Morgane CouchetUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA), Grenoble, France.
Christelle CorneUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Institute of Biology, Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, Grenoble, France.
Christophe MoinardUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA), Grenoble, France.
Charlotte BreuillardUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA), Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8775-0629
Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombating malnutrition and cachexia is a core challenge in oncology. To limit muscle mass loss, the use of proteins in cancer is encouraged by experts in the field, but it is still debated due to their antagonist effects. Indeed, a high protein intake could preserve lean body mass but may promote tumour growth, whereas a low-protein diet could reduce tumour size but without addressing cachexia. Here we used a realistic rodent model of cancer and chemotherapy to evaluate the influence of different protein intakes on cachexia, tumour response to chemotherapy and immune system response. The goal is to gain a closer understanding of the effect of protein intake in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

methodsFemale Fischer 344 rats were divided into six groups: five groups (n = 14 per group) with cancer (Ward colon tumour) and chemotherapy were fed with isocaloric diets with 8%, 12%, 16%, 24% or 32% of caloric intake from protein and one healthy control group (n = 8) fed a 16% protein diet, considered as a standard diet. Chemotherapy included two cycles, 1 week apart, each consisting of an injection of CPT-11 (50 mg/kg) followed by 5-fluorouracil (50 mg/kg) the day after. Food intake, body weight, and tumour size were measured daily. On day 9, the rats were euthanized and organs were weighed. Body composition was determined and protein content and protein synthesis (SUnSET method) were measured in the muscle, liver, intestine, and tumour. Immune function was explored by flow cytometry.

resultsCancer and chemotherapy led to a decrease in body weight characterized by a decrease of both fat mass (-56 ± 3%, P < 0.05) and fat-free mass (-8 ± 1%, P < 0.05). Surprisingly, there was no effect of protein diet on body composition, muscle or tumour parameters (weight, protein content, or protein synthesis) but a high cumulative protein intake was positively associated with a high relative body weight and high fat-free mass. The immune system was impacted by cancer and chemotherapy but not by the different amount of protein intake.

conclusionsUsing a realistic model of cancer and chemotherapy, we demonstrated for the first time that protein intake did not positively or negatively modulate tumour growth. Moreover, our results suggested that a high cumulative protein intake was able to improve moderately nutritional status in chemotherapy treated cancer rodents. Although this work cannot be evaluated clinically for ethical reasons, it nevertheless brings an essential contribution to nutrition management for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsNeoplasmsNutritional StatusAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBody CompositionBody WeightCachexiaDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansRatsRats, Inbred F344Antineoplastic AgentsDietary ProteinsCachexiaCancerChemotherapyMalnutritionProtein dietTumour

Identifiers

PMID37667552
PMCPMC10570073
OpenAlexW4386439285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.