Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667366›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for undergraduate medical education - development and exploration of social validity.

Christina Gummesson, Stina Alm, Anna Cederborg, Mattias Ekstedt, Jarl Hellman, Hans Hjelmqvist, Magnus Hultin, Katarina Jood, Charlotte Leanderson, Bertil Lindahl and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christina GummessonFaculty of Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden. christina.gummesson@mau.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-356X
Stina AlmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Futurum - the Academy for Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Umeå University, Paediatrics, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-1151
Anna CederborgInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Department of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5071-4915
Mattias EkstedtDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-8601
Jarl HellmanDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-5511
Hans HjelmqvistDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5294-8387
Magnus HultinDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-7161
Katarina JoodDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Department of Neurology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8746-1771
Charlotte LeandersonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-1504
Bertil LindahlDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5795-0061
Riitta MöllerDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-2777
Björn RosengrenClinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Orthopedics and Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-6927
Anders SjälanderDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-1186
Peter J SvenssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-6877
Stefan SärnbladDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Alexander TejeraDivision of Translational Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as a framework for work-based training and assessment in undergraduate medical education has become popular. EPAs are defined as units of a professional activity requiring adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes, with a recognized output of professional labor, independently executable within a time frame, observable and measurable in its process and outcome, and reflecting one or more competencies. Before a new framework is implemented in a specific context, it is valuable to explore social validity, that is, the acceptability by relevant stakeholders.

aimThe aim of our work was to define Core EPAs for undergraduate medical education and further explore the social validity of the constructs. METHOD AND MATERIAL: In a nationwide collaboration, EPAs were developed using a modified Delphi procedure and validated according to EQual by a group consisting of teachers nominated from each of the seven Swedish medical schools, two student representatives, and an educational developer (n = 16). In the next step, social validity was explored in a nationwide survey. The survey introduced the suggested EPAs. For each EPA, the importance of the EPA was rated, as was the rater's perception of the present graduates' required level of supervision when performing the activity. Free-text comments were also included and analyzed.

resultsTen Core EPAs were defined and validated. The validation scores for EQual ranged from 4.1 to 4.9. The nationwide survey had 473 responders. All activities were rated as "important" by most responders, ranging from 54 to 96%. When asked how independent current graduates were in performing the ten activities, 6 to 35% reported "independent". The three themes of the free text comments were: 'relevant target areas and content'; 'definition of the activities'; and 'clinical practice and learning'.

conclusionTen Core EPAs were defined and assessed as relevant for Swedish undergraduate medical education. There was a consistent gap between the perceived importance and the certainty that the students could perform these professional activities independently at the time of graduation. These results indicate that the ten EPAs may have a role in undergraduate education by creating clarity for all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Educational PersonnelEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEducational StatusHumansLearningSchools, MedicalDevelopmentEntrustable professional activitiesSocial validity

Identifiers

PMID37667366
PMCPMC10478490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.