Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667130›Full record

ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2024

Mineralization and morphology of peri-implant bone around loaded and unloaded dental implants retrieved from the human mandible.

Fausto Zamparini, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Andrea Spinelli, Mauro Ferri, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli, Carlo Prati

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fausto ZampariniLaboratory of Biomaterials and Oral Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy. fausto.zamparini2@unibo.it.
Maria Giovanna GandolfiLaboratory of Biomaterials and Oral Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea SpinelliEndodontic Clinical Section, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Mauro FerriSchool of Dentistry, Corporación Universitária Rafael Núñez, 130001, Cartagena, de Indias, Colombia.
Giovanna IezziDepartment of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti/Pescara, 66013, Chieti, Italy.
Daniele BotticelliARDEC Academy, 47923, Rimini, Italy.
Carlo PratiEndodontic Clinical Section, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITCorporación Universitaria Rafael Nuñez · COUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimited data is reported regarding the bone mineralization around dental implants in the first months from insertion. The study analyzed the peri-implant bone around loaded and unloaded implants retrieved from human mandible after 4 months from placement.

methodThe composition and mineralization of human bone were analyzed through an innovative protocol technique using Environmental-Scanning-Electron-Microscopy connected with Energy-Dispersive-X-Ray-Spectroscopy (ESEM/EDX). Two regions of interest (ROIs, approximately 750×500 μm) for each bone implant sample were analyzed at the cortical (Cortical ROI) and apical (Apical ROI) implant threads. Calcium, phosphorus, and nitrogen (atomic%) were determined using EDX, and the specific ratios (Ca/N, P/N, and Ca/P) were calculated as mineralization indices.

resultsEighteen implant biopsies from ten patients were analyzed (unloaded implants, n=10; loaded implants, n=8). For each ROI, four bone areas (defined bones 1-4) were detected. These areas were characterized by different mineralization degree, varied Ca, P and N content, and different ratios, and by specific grayscale intensity detectable by ESEM images. Bony tissue in contact with loaded implants at the cortical ROI showed a higher percentage of low mineralized bone (bone 1) and a lower percentage of remodeling bone (bone 2) when compared to unloaded implants. The percentage of highly mineralized bone (bone 3) was similar in all groups.

conclusionCortical and apical ROIs resulted in a puzzle of different bone "islands" characterized by various rates of mineralization. Only the loaded implants showed a high rate of mineralization in the cortical ROI.

Indexed as

Calcification, PhysiologicDental ImplantsMandibleAgedCalciumDental Implantation, EndosseousFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMiddle AgedNitrogenPhosphorusSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionCalciumDental ImplantsNitrogenPhosphorusDental implantsESEM-EDXLoadingMineralization degreePeri-implant boneRetrieved implants

Identifiers

PMID37667130
PMCPMC11144681
OpenAlexW4386424102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.