Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37667021›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Electronic health records and stratified psychiatry: bridge to precision treatment?

Adrienne Grzenda, Alik S Widge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Responsible artificial intelligence integration framework for psychiatric guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrienne GrzendaDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. agrzenda@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-6953
Alik S WidgeDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-341X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of a stratified psychiatry approach that combines electronic health records (EHR) data with machine learning (ML) is one potentially fruitful path toward rapidly improving precision treatment in clinical practice. This strategy, however, requires confronting pervasive methodological flaws as well as deficiencies in transparency and reporting in the current conduct of ML-based studies for treatment prediction. EHR data shares many of the same data quality issues as other types of data used in ML prediction, plus some unique challenges. To fully leverage EHR data's power for patient stratification, increased attention to data quality and collection of patient-reported outcome data is needed.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPsychiatryHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37667021
PMCPMC10700348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.