Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37666948›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2024

Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference.

Xin Huang, Aigerim Rymbekova, Olga Dolgova, Oscar Lao, Martin Kuhlwilm

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bayesian neural networks for genomic prediction: uncertainty quantification and SNP interpretation with SHAP and GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin HuangDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. xin.huang@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9918-9602
Aigerim RymbekovaDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5461-5161
Olga DolgovaIntegrative Genomics Laboratory, CIC bioGUNE - Centro de Investigación Cooperativa en Biociencias, Derio, Biscaya, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-9388
Oscar LaoInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. oscar.lao@ibe.upf-csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-9649
Martin KuhlwilmDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. martin.kuhlwilm@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-1797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In population genetics, the emergence of large-scale genomic data for various species and populations has provided new opportunities to understand the evolutionary forces that drive genetic diversity using statistical inference. However, the era of population genomics presents new challenges in analysing the massive amounts of genomes and variants. Deep learning has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance for numerous applications involving large-scale data. Recently, deep learning approaches have gained popularity in population genetics; facilitated by the advent of massive genomic data sets, powerful computational hardware and complex deep learning architectures, they have been used to identify population structure, infer demographic history and investigate natural selection. Here, we introduce common deep learning architectures and provide comprehensive guidelines for implementing deep learning models for population genetic inference. We also discuss current challenges and future directions for applying deep learning in population genetics, focusing on efficiency, robustness and interpretability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBiological EvolutionGenetics, PopulationGenomeGenomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.