Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37666922›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Meningioma brain tumor detection and classification using hybrid CNN method and RIDGELET transform.

B V Prakash, A Rajiv Kannan, N Santhiyakumari, S Kumarganesh, D Siva Sundhara Raja, J Jasmine Hephzipah, K MartinSagayam, Marc Pomplun, Hien Dang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B V PrakashFaculty of Information Technology, Government College of Engineering, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
A Rajiv KannanFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, K.S.R College of Engineering, Namakkal, India.
N SanthiyakumariDepartment of ECE, Knowledge Institute of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
S KumarganeshDepartment of ECE, Knowledge Institute of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
D Siva Sundhara RajaFaculty of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SACS MAVMM Engineering College, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Jasmine HephzipahFaculty of Electronics and Communication Engineering, R.M.K. Engineering College, Kavaraipettai, Tamil Nadu, India.
K MartinSagayamDepartment of ECE, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India.
Marc PomplunDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Hien DangDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Molloy University, Rockville Centre, NY, USA. hiendt@tlu.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of meningioma tumors is the most crucial task compared with other tumors because of their lower pixel intensity. Modern medical platforms require a fully automated system for meningioma detection. Hence, this study proposes a novel and highly efficient hybrid Convolutional neural network (HCNN) classifier to distinguish meningioma brain images from non-meningioma brain images. The HCNN classification technique consists of the Ridgelet transform, feature computations, classifier module, and segmentation algorithm. Pixel stability during the decomposition process was improved by the Ridgelet transform, and the features were computed from the coefficient of the Ridgelet. These features were classified using the HCNN classification approach, and tumor pixels were detected using the segmentation algorithm. The experimental results were analyzed for meningioma tumor images by applying the proposed method to the BRATS 2019 and Nanfang dataset. The proposed HCNN-based meningioma detection system achieved 99.31% sensitivity, 99.37% specificity, and 99.24% segmentation accuracy for the BRATS 2019 dataset. The proposed HCNN technique achieved99.35% sensitivity, 99.22% specificity, and 99.04% segmentation accuracy on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Nanfang dataset. The proposed system obtains 99.81% classification accuracy, 99.2% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity and 99.8% segmentation accuracy on BRATS 2022 dataset. The experimental results of the proposed HCNN algorithm were compared with those of the state-of-the-art meningioma detection algorithms in this study.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37666922
PMCPMC10477173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.