Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37666808›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

DNA nanopores as artificial membrane channels for bioprotonics.

Le Luo, Swathi Manda, Yunjeong Park, Busra Demir, Jesse Sanchez, M P Anantram, Ersin Emre Oren, Ashwin Gopinath, Marco Rolandi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Ion Permeability of DNA Nanotube Channels.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Native globular ferritin nanopore sensor.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Le Luo *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jack Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Swathi Manda *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-1606
Yunjeong Park *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jack Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Busra DemirBionanodesign Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, 06560, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3911-2291
Jesse SanchezDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jack Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-1971
M P AnantramDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2539-7457
Ersin Emre OrenBionanodesign Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, 06560, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-083X
Ashwin GopinathDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. agopi@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-9457
Marco RolandiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jack Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA. mrolandi@ucsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7898-2479
University of California, Santa Cruz · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USTOBB University of Economics and Technology · TROregon State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological membrane channels mediate information exchange between cells and facilitate molecular recognition. While tuning the shape and function of membrane channels for precision molecular sensing via de-novo routes is complex, an even more significant challenge is interfacing membrane channels with electronic devices for signal readout, which results in low efficiency of information transfer - one of the major barriers to the continued development of high-performance bioelectronic devices. To this end, we integrate membrane spanning DNA nanopores with bioprotonic contacts to create programmable, modular, and efficient artificial ion-channel interfaces. Here we show that cholesterol modified DNA nanopores spontaneously and with remarkable affinity span the lipid bilayer formed over the planar bio-protonic electrode surface and mediate proton transport across the bilayer. Using the ability to easily modify DNA nanostructures, we illustrate that this bioprotonic device can be programmed for electronic recognition of biomolecular signals such as presence of Streptavidin and the cardiac biomarker B-type natriuretic peptide, without modifying the biomolecules. We anticipate this robust interface will allow facile electronic measurement and quantification of biomolecules in a multiplexed manner.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialNanoporesCell MembraneDNALipid BilayersDNALipid BilayersMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID37666808
PMCPMC10477224
OpenAlexW4386418637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.