Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37666577›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Making health insurance responsive to citizens: the management of members' complaints by mutual health organisations in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Dosithee Ngo Bebe, Fulbert Nappa Kwilu, Arlette Mavila, Eric Musalu Mafuta, José Mobhe Mangalu, Nasreen S Jessani, Bart Criel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dosithee Ngo BebeSchool of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the) ngobebed@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7088-7271
Fulbert Nappa KwiluSchool of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Arlette MavilaSchool of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Eric Musalu MafutaSchool of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
José Mobhe MangaluDepartment of Population Sciences and Development, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Nasreen S JessaniBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Bart CrielDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn moving towards universal health coverage, a number of low-income and middle-income countries have adopted community-based health insurance (CBHI) as a means to reduce both the inequity in healthcare access and the burden of catastrophic health expenditures linked to user fees. However, organisations managing CBHIs face many challenges, including a poor relationship with their members. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, CBHI schemes are managed by mutual health organisations (MHOs) and are in the process of enhancing their accountability and responsiveness to members' needs and expectations. This study assessed how MHOs have managed member complaints and their performance in grievance redressal.

methodsUsing a sequential mixed-methods approach, we drew insights from four types of sources: review of approximately 50 relevant documents, 25 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with CBHI managers, 9 IDIs with health facility managers, 1063 surveys of MHO members and 15 focus group discussions (FGDs) comprising an additional 153 MHO members. MHO members in this study belonged to three different MHOs (Lisanga, La Borne and Mutuelle de santé des Enseignants de l'Enseignement Primaire, Secondaire et Professionnel) in the capital, Kinshasa.

resultsThe document review showed that there were no clear administrative processes for the implementation of the grievance redressal arrangement measures resulting in low member awareness of these measures. These results were confirmed by the IDIs. Of 1044 members surveyed, only 240 (23%) were aware of the complaint measures, and 201 (84%) of these declared they had used the measures at some point in time, 181/201 (90%) users who had used the measures declared being satisfied with the response provided. The FGDs confirmed that most members lack knowledge on the grievance redressal procedures, but those who were aware had made use of them and were often satisfied with the response provided.

conclusionMHOs should urgently improve communication with their members on the range of redressal measures put in place to address grievances. Attention should be given to properly monitor existing arrangements, and possibly adapt them with well-documented and communicated standard operating procedures.

Indexed as

CommunicationInsurance, HealthDemocratic Republic of the CongoFocus GroupsHealth ExpendituresHumansHealth economicsHealth insuranceHealth policyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID37666577
PMCPMC10514665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.