ArticleBMJ open2023
Indications of alcohol or drug use disorders in five different national registers in Sweden: a cross-sectional population-based study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Substance use disorders among refugee and non-refugee immigrants in Sweden.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Discontinuation and reinitiation of pharmacological treatment for ADHD among individuals with ADHD and substance use disorder.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Pramipexole treatment and substance use disorder risk in unipolar and bipolar depression: a Swedish nationwide register study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Risk of substance use disorders in the adult children of parents with severe alcohol use disorder: a nationwide cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of indications of alcohol or drug use disorders in five different national Swedish registers and to investigate the correlation between these registers. Furthermore, the intent is to investigate whether combining data from different registers increases the prevalence of these indications in the population due to the identification of different demographic groups in different registers.
designCross-sectional study. SETTING AND
participantsIndividuals living in Sweden aged 20-64 years in 2006, n=5 453 616. PRIMARY OUTCOME: National registers included the Registers of Inpatient Care, Outpatient Care, Medications, Social Insurance and Convictions. Demographic variables were sex, age, migrant status, education and civil status. Indications of alcohol or drug use disorders were presented as prevalence in percentage (%), correlation was examined using phi correlation coefficients and differences across demographic factors were studied using logistic regression.
resultsThe prevalence of an indication of alcohol or drug use disorder varied between registers, meaning that prevalence increased when all registers were considered together. The prevalence of alcohol use disorder increased by 60% and 66% among men and women, respectively, while the prevalence of drug use disorder increased by 45% and 80% among men and women, respectively, when all registers were combined, compared with only using the register with the highest prevalence. Registers contributed different indications of drug and alcohol use disorders.
conclusionsAccurate estimates of alcohol or drug use disorders are critical for healthcare and rehabilitation. This study shows that using a single register alone underestimates the burden of disease unevenly, while combining a range of registers can provide a more accurate picture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.