Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37666514›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2023

Multifaceted intervention to increase the delivery of alcohol brief interventions in primary care: a mixed-methods process analysis.

Elizabeth Sturgiss, Jenny Advocat, Tina Lam, Suzanne Nielsen, Lauren Ball, Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Catherine Martin, Chris Barton, Chun Wah Michael Tam, Helen Skouteris and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth SturgissSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-4060
Jenny AdvocatSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7965-2244
Tina LamMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-7293
Suzanne NielsenMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-1055
Lauren BallGrad Dip Health Economics and Health Policy, chair of community health and wellbeing, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5394-0931
Nilakshi GunatillakaSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Catherine MartinSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8243-5873
Chris BartonGAICD, CF, head.ORCID 0000-0001-9823-7425
Chun Wah Michael TamPrimary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; conjoint senior lecturer, School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8645-4756
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-5750
Danielle MazzaGAICD, CF, head.ORCID 0000-0001-6158-7376
Grant RussellDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-2355
Monash University · AUCrescent Development Foundation · PKEastern Health · AUGriffith University · AUUniversity of Warwick · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrief interventions (BIs) are effective for reducing harmful alcohol consumption, but their use in primary care is less frequent than clinically indicated. The REducing AlCohol- related Harm (REACH) project aimed to increase the delivery of BIs in primary care.

aimTo assess the effectiveness of the REACH programme in increasing alcohol BIs in general practice and explore the implementation factors that improve or reduce uptake by clinicians. DESIGN AND

settingThis article reports on a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study of the implementation of the REACH project in six general practice clinics serving low-income communities in Melbourne, Australia.

methodTime-series analyses were conducted using routinely collected patient records and semi-structured interviews, guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research.

resultsThe six intervention sites significantly increased their rate of recorded alcohol status (56.7% to 60.4%), whereas there was no significant change in the non-intervention practices (344 sites, 55.2% to 56.4%).

conclusionREACH resources were seen as useful and acceptable by clinicians and staff. National policies that support the involvement of primary care in alcohol harm reduction helped promote ongoing intervention sustainability.

Indexed as

AlcoholismGeneral PracticeCounselingCrisis InterventionHumansPrimary Health Carealcohol drinkingbrief interventionsCOVID-19implementation scienceprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID37666514
PMCPMC10498380
OpenAlexW4379513275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.