Trial reportIndian heart journal
A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation.
Trial report in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reassessing Ivabradine: Potential Benefits and Risks in Atrial Fibrillation Therapy.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIvabradine may have a role in rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to effects on HCN channels in AV node. We studied role of Ivabradine in rate control of rheumatic AF.
methods80 patients, rheumatic AF, HR > 100 bpm (age 47 ± 11 yrs, AF duration 6.8 ± 2.9 years, rate 131 ± 16 bpm) on maximally tolerated ββ or CCB's, randomized to Ivabradine or escalated ββ/CCB. Ivabradine started @ 2.5 mg BD; increased to 5 mg BD if inadequate response at 1 week (failure to decrease HR < 10% vs baseline). After Holter at 1 month, dose escalated to 7.5 mg BD if needed.
resultsIvabradine resulted in significantly lower HR (81 ± 10 vs 99 ± 9) at 3 months and 6 months (79 ± 8 vs 94 ± 8, p < 0.001). Absolute reduction in HR: 56 ± 15 vs 31 ± 14 bpm and % change in HR: 41 ± 7 vs 24 ± 9%, both p < 0.00001). At 6 months, Ivabradine group had. 1Significantly lower NT Pro BNP (1168 vs 1314 pg/ml), higher 6 min walk distance (410 ± 47 vs 349 ± 54 m, all p < 0.001) 2Better symptom class (EHRA score 1: asymptomatic 84% vs 40%), improvement >1 EHRA class; baseline 60% vs 17% 3Better LA Strain (22.8 ± 2.8% vs 20.6 ± 2.5%) Ivabradine was well tolerated and there was no drug withdrawal.
conclusionOur data suggest that Ivabradine can be an option for rate control in rheumatic AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.