Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37666391›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Changes in Provider Perceptions and Practices Regarding Dosing Units for Oral Liquid Medications.

Jennifer N Lind, Maribeth C Lovegrove, Ian M Paul, Hsiang Shonna Yin, Daniel S Budnitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer N LindDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion (JN Lind, MC Lovegrove, and DS Budnitz), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: jlind@cdc.gov.
Maribeth C LovegroveDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion (JN Lind, MC Lovegrove, and DS Budnitz), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: mml6@cdc.gov.
Ian M PaulDepartments of Pediatrics and Public Health Sciences (IM Paul), Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA. Electronic address: ipaul@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Hsiang Shonna YinDepartments of Pediatrics and Population Health (HS Yin), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY. Electronic address: hsiang.yin@nyulangone.org.
Daniel S BudnitzDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion (JN Lind, MC Lovegrove, and DS Budnitz), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: dbudnitz@gmail.com.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA 2015 survey of primary care providers (PCPs) found that while many believed that milliliter (mL)-only dosing was safest for oral liquid medications, few would use mL alone in dosing instructions. Since 2015, many recommendations have promoted "mL-only" dosing. In 2019, a follow-up survey was conducted to assess if PCP perceptions and practices have changed.

methodsPediatricians, family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners, and internists participating in the 2015 and 2019 DocStyles cross-sectional, web-based surveys were asked about their perceptions and practices regarding dosing units for oral liquid medications.

resultsIn 2019, among 1392 respondents, the proportion of PCPs who reported they believed using mL-only is the safest dosing instruction ranged from 55.1% of internists to 80.8% of pediatricians. While fewer PCPs believed patients/caregivers prefer dosing instructions in mL-only (23.9% of nurse practitioners to 48.4% of pediatricians), more held this belief in 2019 compared to 2015; pediatricians had the greatest absolute increase (+14.4%) and family medicine physicians had the smallest increase (+1.3%). While 61.6% of pediatricians reported they would use mL-only dosing, only 36.0% of internists, 36.6% of nurse practitioners, and 42.5% of family medicine physicians reported they would do so. After controlling for age, gender, region, and specialty, 2019 PCP survey participants were more likely to report that they would use mL-only dosing compared to 2015 participants (adjusted odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.77).

conclusionsBroader educational efforts may be necessary to reach nonpediatricians, to encourage prescribing and communication with patients/caregivers using mL-only dosing.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPediatriciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Administration, OralAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedNurse PractitionersPhysicians, FamilySurveys and Questionnairesdosing unitsmillilitersoral liquid medicationsprimary care providers

Identifiers

PMID37666391
PMCPMC10919552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.