Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665969›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2023

Dilemmas in rehabilitation and patient strategies in an intensive home intervention: a follow-up study.

Lena-Karin Gustafsson, Anna Bondesson, Tina Pettersson, Mirkka Söderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena-Karin GustafssonDivision of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5670-6908
Anna BondessonDivision of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Tina PetterssonDivision of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Mirkka SödermanSenior lecturer, Division of Caring Science, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-623X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe original project, where older persons received reablement performed by an interprofessional team showed success factors for IHR. However, since there is a lack of knowledge about why some persons do not recover despite receiving IHR, this study follows up patients' experiences of IHR.

aimTo describe older persons' perceived dilemmas in the reablement process within the framework of IHR.

method11 CIT interviews with participants who have previously received IHR, were analysed, interpreted and categorized according to CIT. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority.

resultsThe results showed disease-related dilemmas, fatigue or pain so that participants could not cope with the prescribed exercises. New diseases appeared, as well as medication side effects made exercising difficult, and painkillers became a prerequisite for coping with IHR. Low self-motivation and mistrust towards the staff emerged like lack of trust due to otherness such as sex, cultural background, or language also became critical.

conclusionsInterventions that consider individual- and contextual dilemmas are very important. By recognizing critical situations, this study can work as a basis of evidence to further develop interventions for older people living in their own homes and to ensure them to stay there.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsExercise TherapyAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overCultureFollow-Up StudiesHumansActive ageingfollow-uphome rehabilitationinterprofessional teammunicipal carereablementrecovery

Identifiers

PMID37665969
PMCPMC10478589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.