Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665745›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2023

Breast cancer risk assessment and risk distribution in 3,491 Slovenian women invited for screening at the age of 50; a population-based cross-sectional study.

Katja Jarm, Vesna Zadnik, Mojca Birk, Milos Vrhovec, Kristijana Hertl, Zan Klanecek, Andrej Studen, Cveto Sval, Mateja Krajc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katja JarmSector for Cancer Screening and Clinical Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vesna ZadnikFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mojca BirkSector for Oncology Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Milos VrhovecSector for Cancer Screening and Clinical Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kristijana HertlSector for Cancer Screening and Clinical Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zan KlanecekFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrej StudenFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cveto SvalSector for Cancer Screening and Clinical Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mateja KrajcSector for Cancer Screening and Clinical Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Primorska · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence shows that risk-based strategy could be implemented to avoid unnecessary harm in mammography screening for breast cancer (BC) using age-only criterium. Our study aimed at identifying the uptake of Slovenian women to the BC risk assessment invitation and assessing the number of screening mammographies in case of risk-based screening. PATIENTS AND

methodsA cross-sectional population-based study enrolled 11,898 women at the age of 50, invited to BC screening. The data on BC risk factors, including breast density from the first 3,491 study responders was collected and BC risk was assessed using the Tyrer-Cuzick algorithm (version 8) to classify women into risk groups (low, population, moderately increased, and high risk group). The number of screening mammographies according to risk stratification was simulated.

results57% (6,785) of women returned BC risk questionnaires. When stratifying 3,491 women into risk groups, 34.0% were assessed with low, 62.2% with population, 3.4% with moderately increased, and 0.4% with high 10-year BC risk. In the case of potential personalised screening, the number of screening mammographies would drop by 38.6% compared to the current screening policy.

conclusionsThe study uptake showed the feasibility of risk assessment when inviting women to regular BC screening. 3.8% of Slovenian women were recognised with higher than population 10-year BC risk. According to Slovenian BC guidelines they may be screened more often. Overall, personalised screening would decrease the number of screening mammographies in Slovenia. This information is to be considered when planning the pilot and assessing the feasibility of implementing population risk-based screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerBreastCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansRisk Assessmentbreast cancer screeningbreast densityIBISpersonalised screeningrisk assessmentTyrer-Cuzick model

Identifiers

PMID37665745
PMCPMC10476908
OpenAlexW4386408438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.