ArticleAging2023
Identification and validation of a prognostic signature of cuproptosis-related genes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly lethal form of cancer. Cuproptosis is a recently discovered form of regulated cell death. However, its significance in ESCC remains largely unknown. In this study, we observed significant expression differences in most of the 12 cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) in the TCGA-ESCC dataset, which was validated using GSE20347, GSE38129, and individual ESCC datasets. We were able to divide patients in the TCGA-ESCC cohort into two subgroups based on disease, and found significant differences in survivor outcomes and biological functions between these subgroups. Additionally, we identified 11 prognosis-related genes from the 12 CRGs using LASSO COX regression analysis and constructed a CRGs signature for ESCC. Patients were categorized into high- and low-risk subgroups based on their median risk score, with those in the high-risk subgroup having significantly worse overall survival than those in the low-risk subgroup. The CRGs signature was also highly accurate in predicting prognosis and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that 8 of the 11 CRGs were independent prognostic factors for predicting survival in ESCC patients. Furthermore, our nomogram performed well and could serve as a useful tool for predicting prognosis. Finally, our risk model was found to be relevant to the sensitivity of targeted agents and immune infiltration. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that the risk model was associated with biological pathways of tumor migration and invasion. In summary, our study may provide a promising prognostic signature based on CRGs and offers potential targets for personalized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.