Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665539›Full record

Trial reportJournal of immigrant and minority health2024

A Pilot Efficacy Trial to Educate Muslim Americans about the Islamic Bioethical Perspectives in End-of-Life Healthcare.

Milda Saunders, Michael Quinn, Rosie Duivenbode, Lindsay Zasadzinski, Aasim I Padela

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mosques and Public Health Promotion: A Scoping Review of Faith-Driven Health Interventions.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Milda SaundersSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2007, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. msaunders@uchicago.edu.
Michael QuinnSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2007, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Rosie DuivenbodeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lindsay ZasadzinskiSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2007, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Aasim I PadelaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ronald T. Ackermann, MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
HRSA HHS HRSA R39OT31104NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the US, end-of-life health care (EOLHC) is often intensive and invasive, and at times may involve care that is inconsistent with patient values. US Muslims may not receive appropriate religious support, experience uncertainty around end-of-life decision-making, and under-utilize palliative and hospice care. As technological advancements and treatment options rise in EOLHC, Muslim American patients and their families need to understand more about the treatment options that are consistent with their beliefs. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of a pilot mosque-based educational workshop focused on increasing Muslim Americans' religious bioethics knowledge about end-of-life healthcare. Intervention sites were four mosques with racially and ethnically diverse members, two in the Chicago metropolitan area and two in the Washington, D.C. area. Eligible participants were self-reported Muslims, aged 18 years or older, who were proficient in English. The intervention included a pre and post-test survey and a workshop focused on the Islamic bioethical perspectives on EOLHC. Knowledge was measured with six true-false questions. Baseline and post-intervention scores were analyzed by McNemar's test and bivariate correlation. Overall, the analysis showed a significant improvement in post-intervention participant knowledge. There was increased knowledge of Islamic bioethical views on the moral status of seeking healthcare, brain death controversies, and religious perspectives on withholding or withdrawing life support near the end of life. Our pilot intervention successfully increased participant knowledge and underscores the need to improve the Muslim community's knowledge about the bioethical dimensions of EOLHC.

Indexed as

IslamTerminal CareDeathDelivery of Health CareHumansUnited StatesWashingtonBioethicsEducationEnd of life healthcareInterventionMuslim Americans

Identifiers

PMID37665539
PMCPMC11184506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.