Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665459›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Systems-Wide Site-Specific Analysis of Glycoproteins.

Kathirvel Alagesan, Emmanuelle Charpentier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathirvel AlagesanMax Planck Unit for the Science of Pathogens, Berlin, Germany. alagesan@mpusp.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-5558
Emmanuelle CharpentierMax Planck Unit for the Science of Pathogens, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-0778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosylation is one of the most common and complex post-translation modifications that influence the structural and functional properties of proteins. Glycoproteins are highly heterogeneous and exhibit site- and protein-specific expression differences. Mass spectrometry in combination with liquid chromatography has emerged as the most powerful tool for the comprehensive characterization of glycosylation. The analysis of intact glycopeptides has emerged as a promising strategy to analyze glycoproteins for their glycan heterogeneity at both protein- and site-specific levels. Nevertheless, intact glycopeptide characterization is challenging as elucidation of the glycan and peptide moieties requires specific sample preparation workflows that, combined with the tandem mass spectrometry approach, enable the identification of single glycopeptide species. In this chapter, we provide a detailed description of the methods that include procedures for (i) proteolytic digestion using specific proteases, (ii) optional glycopeptide enrichment using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography, (iii) nano-LC-MS/MS analysis of glycopeptides, and (iv) data analysis for identification of glycopeptides. Together, our workflow provides a framework for the system-wide site-specific analysis of N- and O-glycopeptides derived from complex biological or clinical samples.

Indexed as

GlycoproteinsTandem Mass SpectrometryGlycopeptidesGlycosylationPeptide HydrolasesSystems AnalysisGlycopeptidesGlycoproteinsPeptide HydrolasesGlycopeptidesGlycoproteomicsGlycosylationLiquid chromatographyMass spectrometry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.