ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Achieving imaging and computational reproducibility on multiparametric MRI radiomics features in brain tumor diagnosis: phantom and clinical validation.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics-based artificial intelligence models in brain tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.Neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI-derived radiomics on a 0.35 T MR-Linac using a tissue-mimicking phantom.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- MRI analysis of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: correlating imaging features with histological grade.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Multi-institutional MRI-based radiomic pilot study to measure the variations between scanner vendors and imaging sessions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MRI for differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: an analysis incorporating DWI, DCE-MRI, and contrast agent preload DSC-PWI.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Graph feature selection for enhancing radiomic stability and reproducibility across multiple institutions in head and neck cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Establishment of a CT-based radiomic feature robustness databank for OPC patients via image perturbation in a multi-institutional study: a practical method to safeguard model generalizability.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Is a study on radiomics reproducibility reproducible? Let's see, but an open door anyway.European radiology · 2024Article
- Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors.Cancers · 2024Review
- A hybrid deep learning scheme for MRI-based preliminary multiclassification diagnosis of primary brain tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Term equivalent age brain MRI of preterm newborns: gathering the pieces for prognostication.European radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative has helped improve the computational reproducibility of MRI radiomics features. Nonetheless, the MRI sequences and features with high imaging reproducibility are yet to be established. To determine reproducible multiparametric MRI radiomics features across test-retest, multi-scanner, and computational reproducibility comparisons, and to evaluate their clinical value in brain tumor diagnosis.
methodsTo assess reproducibility, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were acquired from three 3-T MRI scanners using standardized phantom, and radiomics features were extracted using two computational algorithms. Reproducible radiomics features were selected when the concordance correlation coefficient value above 0.9 across multiple sessions, scanners, and computational algorithms. Random forest classifiers were trained with reproducible features (n = 117) and validated in a clinical cohort (n = 50) to evaluate whether features with high reproducibility improved the differentiation of glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs).
resultsRadiomics features from T2WI demonstrated higher repeatability (65-94%) than those from DWI (38-48%) or T1WI (2-92%). Across test-retest, multi-scanner, and computational comparisons, T2WI provided 41 reproducible features, DWI provided six, and T1WI provided two. The performance of the classification model with reproducible features was higher than that using non-reproducible features in both training set (AUC, 0.916 vs. 0.877) and validation set (AUC, 0.957 vs. 0.869).
conclusionRadiomics features with high reproducibility across multiple sessions, scanners, and computational algorithms were identified, and they showed higher diagnostic performance than non-reproducible radiomics features in the differentiation of glioblastoma from PCNSL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: By identifying the radiomics features showing higher multi-machine reproducibility, our results also demonstrated higher radiomics diagnostic performance in the differentiation of glioblastoma from PCNSL, paving the way for further research designs and clinical application in neuro-oncology. KEY POINTS: • Highly reproducible radiomics features across multiple sessions, scanners, and computational algorithms were identified using phantom and applied to clinical diagnosis. • Radiomics features from T2-weighted imaging were more reproducible than those from T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging. • Radiomics features with good reproducibility had better diagnostic performance for brain tumors than features with poor reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.