Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665388›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2024

Volume reduction rate of radiofrequency ablation in ≤ 2 cm Bethesda IV thyroid nodules.

YiJie Dong, WeiWei Zhan, JianQiao Zhou, Ning Li, ZhenHua Liu, ShuJun Xia, XiaoFeng Ni, Juan Liu, JingWen Zhang, ShangYan Xu and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

YiJie DongDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
WeiWei ZhanDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. shanghairuijin@126.com.
JianQiao ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. zhousu30@126.com.
Ning LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Anning First People's Hospital, Affiliated to Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
ZhenHua LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
ShuJun XiaDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
XiaoFeng NiDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Juan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
JingWen ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
ShangYan XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
ZhiFang YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Qing HuaDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Ruijin Hospital · CNKunming University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Academician Expert Workstation of Yunnan Province 202105AF150087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating ≤ 2 cm thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV cytology and C-TIRADS 4A categorization. Additionally, the factors influencing the completed absorption of ablation (CAA) were examined.

methodsA total of 62 cases with 62 nodules underwent ultrasound-guided RFA and were included in the study. The volume reduction rate (VRR), CAA, and incomplete absorption of ablation (IAA) were assessed at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and subsequent 6-month follow-ups. Clinical and ultrasound features were compared between the CAA and IAA groups at the 12th month follow-up.

resultsThe average VRR at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th month, and last follow-up were -88.6%, 16.0%, 59.7%, 82.0%, and 98.2%, respectively. More than half of the nodules achieved a 90% VRR after 1 year of RFA, with 88.7% demonstrating CAA at the end of the study (follow-up duration of 14 to 63 months). Nodules with grade 3 vascularity and those associated with chronic thyroiditis showed delayed CAA at the 12th month follow-up (p = 0.036 and 0.003, respectively).

conclusionRFA is an effective technique for treating ≤ 2 cm thyroid nodules with Bethesda IV cytology and C-TIRADS 4A categorization. Nodules with grade 3 blood supply and patients with chronic thyroiditis exhibited an impact on the completed absorption following RFA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study has shown that radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for ≤ 2 cm thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda IV cytology. However, we identified that high vascularity of the nodule and chronic thyroiditis are adverse factors affecting the completed absorption of the ablation. KEY POINTS: •Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective technique for treatment of ≤ 2 cm Bethesda IV category thyroid nodules. •Higher blood supply and chronic thyroiditis influence the completed absorption after RFA.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHashimoto DiseaseRadiofrequency AblationThyroiditisThyroid NoduleHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyFine needle biopsyRadiofrequency ablationThyroid noduleUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37665388
OpenAlexW4386408075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.