Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665373›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Midterm results of intra-articular stromal vascular fraction injection for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Oğuzhan Çimen, Kaan Süleyman Irgıt, Taner Bekmezci, Ömer Büyüktopçu, Yavuz Şahbat, Alperen Korucu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oğuzhan ÇimenDeparment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthopedic Surgeon, Medistanbul Hospital, Yunus Emre Amh. Lütfi Aykaç Blv. No: 80/G, Sultangazi/Istanbul, Turkey. ozicimen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-9861
Kaan Süleyman IrgıtFulya mah. Yesilcimen sk. Polat Tower Residence, Blok No:12 ic kapi no:407, Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey.
Taner BekmezciClinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Orthopedic Surgeon, Teşvikiye, Hakkı Yeten Cd., 34365, Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ömer BüyüktopçuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevziçakmak Yazmacı Sk. No:7 Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yavuz ŞahbatDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevziçakmak Yazmacı Sk. No:7 Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alperen KorucuDeparment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthopedic Surgeon, Silivri State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Marmara University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-knee stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injection in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis at the midterm (3-year) follow-up.

methodsSVF injection was applied to 25 knees of 20 patients. Eighteen patients (90%) were female, and the means ± standard deviations of age was 61.9 ± 7.8 (range, 50-76) years. Patients who received conservative treatment for at least 6 months and had radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades 2 and 3 varus gonarthrosis were included in the study. SVF was obtained from the umbilical region by liposuction using local anaesthesia. Patients were followed-up for 36 months. Their visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lysholm scores were evaluated before and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-SVF injection.

resultsA statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) was observed in VAS, WOMAC and Lysholm scores at the first 2-year follow-up compared to baseline. However, no statistically significant difference (n.s.) was observed in VAS, WOMAC and Lysholm scores at the 3-year follow-up compared with baseline.

conclusionIntra-articular SVF injection decreased pain and significantly improved the functional outcomes in the first 2 years in knees with grade 2-3 osteoarthritis; however, these positive effects of the injection disappeared in the 3rd year. Although short-term successful results of SVF have been reported in the literature, prospective studies are needed for medium- and long-term results.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeStromal CellsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeCartilageIntra-articular injectionKneeOsteoarthritisStem cellsStromal vascular fractions

Identifiers

PMID37665373
OpenAlexW4386407349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.