Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665352›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2024

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion : A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Study.

Daniel P O Kaiser, Tilman Reiff, Ulrich Mansmann, Daniela Schoene, Davide Strambo, Patrik Michel, Mohamad Abdalkader, Thanh N Nguyen, Matthias Gawlitza, Markus A Möhlenbruch and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Revascularization treatments within 4.5 h after onset in acute ischemic stroke with isolated extracranial artery occlusion.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel P O KaiserInstitute of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. daniel.kaiser@ukdd.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-0025
Tilman ReiffDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-6134
Ulrich MansmannInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-8906
Daniela SchoeneDresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Davide StramboDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrik MichelDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mohamad AbdalkaderDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Thanh N NguyenDivision of Interventional Neurology/Neuroradiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2810-1685
Matthias GawlitzaDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Markus A MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-704X
Peter A RinglebDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volker PuetzDresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes C GerberInstitute of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-8700
Simon NagelDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-6647
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEBoston University · USUniversity of Lausanne · CHLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute symptomatic isolated occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) without involvement of the middle and anterior cerebral arteries is unclear. We aimed to compare clinical and safety outcomes of best medical treatment (BMT) versus EVT + BMT in patients with stroke due to isolated ICA occlusion.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving patients with isolated ICA occlusion between January 2016 and December 2020. We stratified patients by BMT versus EVT and matched the groups using propensity score matching (PSM). We assessed the effect of treatment strategy on favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤ 2) 90 days after treatment and compared reduction in NIHSS score at discharge, rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3‑month mortality.

resultsIn total, we included 149 patients with isolated ICA occlusion. To address imbalances, we matched 45 patients from each group using PSM. The rate of favorable outcomes at 90 days was 56% for EVT and 38% for BMT (odds ratio, OR 1.89, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.84-4.24; p = 0.12). Patients treated with EVT showed a median reduction in NIHSS score at discharge of 6 points compared to 1 point for BMT patients (p = 0.02). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (7% vs. 4%; p = 0.66) and 3‑month mortality (11% vs. 13%; p = 0.74) did not differ between treatment groups. Periprocedural complications of EVT with early neurological deterioration occurred in 7% of cases.

conclusionAlthough the benefit on functional outcome did not reach statistical significance, the results for NIHSS score improvement, and safety support the use of EVT in patients with stroke due to isolated ICA occlusion.

Indexed as

Arterial Occlusive DiseasesBrain IschemiaCarotid Artery DiseasesEndovascular ProceduresStrokeCarotid Artery, InternalHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesPropensity ScoreRisk FactorsThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeAngiographyCervicalInterventionStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID37665352
PMCPMC10881648
OpenAlexW4386407694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.