Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665104›Full record

SynthesisInfection control and hospital epidemiology2024

Diagnostic prediction models to identify patients at risk for healthcare-facility-onset

William M Patterson, Jesse Fajnzylber, Neil Nero, Adrian V Hernandez, Abhishek Deshpande

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

William M Patterson *Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1922-5555
Jesse Fajnzylber *Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-1255
Neil NeroEducation Institute, Floyd D. Loop Alumni Library, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-4785
Adrian V HernandezHealth Outcomes, Policy, and Evidence Synthesis (HOPES) Group, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-4003
Abhishek DeshpandeCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5522-2995
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the methodology, performance, and generalizability of diagnostic models for predicting the risk of healthcare-facility-onset (HO)

backgroundCDI is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Prediction models that identify inpatients at risk of HO-CDI have been published; however, the quality and utility of these models remain uncertain.

methodsTwo independent reviewers evaluated articles describing the development and/or validation of multivariable HO-CDI diagnostic models in an inpatient setting. All publication dates, languages, and study designs were considered. Model details (eg, sample size and source, outcome, and performance) were extracted from the selected studies based on the CHARMS checklist. The risk of bias was further assessed using PROBAST.

resultsOf the 3,030 records evaluated, 11 were eligible for final analysis, which described 12 diagnostic models. Most studies clearly identified the predictors and outcomes but did not report how missing data were handled. The most frequent predictors across all models were advanced age, receipt of high-risk antibiotics, history of hospitalization, and history of CDI. All studies reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) as a measure of discriminatory ability. However, only 3 studies reported the model calibration results, and only 2 studies were externally validated. All of the studies had a high risk of bias.

conclusionThe studies varied in their ability to predict the risk of HO-CDI. Future models will benefit from the validation on a prospective external cohort to maximize external validity.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionHumansModels, StatisticalRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37665104
PMCPMC10877537
OpenAlexW4386407433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.