Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37665008›Full record

ReviewDento maxillo facial radiology2023

Applications of artificial intelligence in the analysis of dental panoramic radiographs: an overview of systematic reviews.

Natalia Turosz, Kamila Chęcińska, Maciej Chęciński, Anita Brzozowska, Zuzanna Nowak, Maciej Sikora

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Research progress on the diagnosis of ectodermal dysplasia and early oral prosthodontic treatment].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia TuroszInstitute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawińska, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8075-9989
Kamila ChęcińskaDepartment of Glass Technology and Amorphous Coatings, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza, Poland.
Maciej ChęcińskiDepartment of Oral Surgery, Preventive Medicine Center, Komorowskiego, Poland.
Anita BrzozowskaPreventive Medicine Center, Komorowskiego, Poland.
Zuzanna NowakDepartment of Temporomandibular Disorders, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Maciej SikoraDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Wojska Polskiego, Poland.
AGH University of Krakow · PLJagiellonian University · PLPomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis overview of systematic reviews aimed to establish the current state of knowledge on the suitability of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental panoramic radiograph analysis and illustrate its changes over time.

methodsMedical databases covered by the Association for Computing Machinery, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Google Scholar, and PubMed engines were searched. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBIS tool. Ultimately, 12 articles were qualified for the qualitative synthesis. The results were visualized with timelines, tables, and charts.

resultsIn the years 1988-2023, a significant development of information technologies for the analysis of DPRs was observed. The latest analyzed AI models achieve high accuracy in detecting caries (91.5%), osteoporosis (89.29%), maxillary sinusitis (87.5%), periodontal bone loss (93.09%), and teeth identification and numbering (93.67%). The detection of periapical lesions is also characterized by high sensitivity (99.95%) and specificity (92%). However, due to the small number of heterogeneous source studies synthesized in systematic reviews, the results of this overview should be interpreted with caution.

conclusionCurrently, AI applications can significantly support dentists in dental panoramic radiograph analysis. As systematic reviews on AI become outdated quickly, their regular updating is recommended. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023416048.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossDental CariesArtificial IntelligenceHumansRadiography, PanoramicSystematic Reviews as TopicArtificial IntelligenceDeep learningDental radiographyOverview of reviewsPanoramic radiographs

Identifiers

PMID37665008
PMCPMC10552133
OpenAlexW4386407767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.