ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2023
Reproducibility and location-stability of radiomic features derived from cone-beam computed tomography: a phantom study.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics-based quantitative assessment of the mandibular cortical index on panoramic radiographs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Radiogenomic Imaging in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- RadRepro CBCT: An Open-Access CBCT Phantom Dataset for Improved Standardization and Reproducibility of Radiomics Research.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Photon-Counting CT Scan Phantom Study: Stability of Radiomics Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to determine the reproducibility and location-stability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiomic features.
methodsCentrifugal tubes with six concentrations of K
resultsThere were 20 and 23 qualified features in the reproducibility and location-stability experiments, respectively. In the reproducibility experiment, the performance of the peripheral groups and high-concentration sets was significantly better than the center groups and low-concentration sets. The effect of concentration on the location-stability of features was not monotonic, and the number of qualified features in the low-concentration sets was greater than that in the high-concentration sets. No features were qualified in both experiments.
conclusionsThe density and location of the target object can affect the number of reproducible radiomic features, and its density can also affect the number of location-stable radiomic features. The problem of feature reliability should be treated cautiously in radiomic research on CBCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.