Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2023
Topotecan clearance based on a single sample and a population pharmacokinetic model: Application to a pediatric high-risk neuroblastoma clinical trial.
Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTopotecan, an antitumor drug with systemic exposure (SE)-dependent activity against many pediatric tumors has wide interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, making it challenging to attain the desired topotecan SE. The study objectives were to update our topotecan population pharmacokinetic model, to evaluate the feasibility of determining individual topotecan clearance using a single blood sample, and to apply this approach to topotecan data from a neuroblastoma trial to explore exposure-response relationships. PROCEDURE: Our previous population pharmacokinetic and covariate model was updated using data from 13 clinical pediatric studies. A simulation-based Bayesian analysis was performed to determine if a single blood sample could be sufficient to estimate individual topotecan clearance. Following the Bayesian approach, single pharmacokinetic samples collected from a Children's Oncology Group Phase III clinical trial (ANBL0532; NCT0056767) were analyzed to estimate individual topotecan SE. Associations between topotecan SE and toxicity or early response were then evaluated.
resultsThe updated population model included the impact of patient body surface area (BSA), age, and renal function on topotecan clearance. The Bayesian analysis with the updated model and single plasma samples showed that individual topotecan clearance values were estimated with good precision (mean absolute prediction error ≤16.2%) and low bias (mean prediction error ≤7.2%). Using the same approach, topotecan SE was derived in patients from ANBL0532. The exposure-response analysis showed an increased early response after concomitant cyclophosphamide and topotecan up to a topotecan SE of 45 h ng/mL.
conclusionsA simple single-sample approach during topotecan therapy could guide dosing for patients, resulting in more patients reaching target attainment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.