Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664872›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023

Community participation for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: insights from the design and implementation of the BornFyne-prenatal management system digital platform in Cameroon.

Pamela Obegu, Miriam Nkangu, Ngo Valery Ngo, Franck Wanda, Mwenya Kasonde, Odette D Kibu, Nelly Abong, Victor Ndiforchu, Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Amos Buh and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pamela ObeguHealth Promotion Alliance of Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Miriam Nkangu *Health Promotion Alliance of Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Ngo Valery NgoNkafu Policy Institute, Denis and Lenora Foretia Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Franck WandaHealth Promotion Alliance of Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Mwenya KasondeHealth Promotion Alliance of Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Odette D KibuNkafu Policy Institute, Denis and Lenora Foretia Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Nelly AbongHealth Promotion Alliance of Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Victor NdiforchuHealth Promotion Alliance of Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Arone Wondwossen FantayeFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Amos BuhInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ronald M GobinaNkafu Policy Institute, Denis and Lenora Foretia Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Denis A ForetiaNkafu Policy Institute, Denis and Lenora Foretia Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Nkengafack FobellahNkafu Policy Institute, Denis and Lenora Foretia Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Sanni YayaSchool of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Health Promotion Agency · NZUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Across communities in low-middle income countries, digital health is currently revolutionizing the delivery of health services, particularly in the field of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) services. While studies have shown the effectiveness of mHealth in delivering RMNCH services, there is little information about factors that enhance mHealth services utilization in low-cost settings including stakeholders' level of influence on the implementation of digital health intervention in sub-Saharan Africa. This paper seeks to describe important lessons on the levels of stakeholders' direct or indirect influence on the design and implementation of the BornFyne-PNMS digital health platform to support RMNCH services. Methods: A participatory research (PR) design approach was employed to explore stakeholders' perspectives of a new initiative, through direct engagement of local priorities and perspectives. The process of introducing the digital application called the BornFyne-PNMS for district health delivery system and the community, and integrating it within the district health delivery system was guided by research-to-action, consistent with the PR approach. To explore stakeholders' perspectives through a PR approach, we conducted a series of stakeholder meetings fashioned after focus group discussions. Results: Issues around male involvement in the program, sensitization and equity concerns arose. Emergent challenges and proposed strategies for implementation from diverse stakeholders evidently enriched the design and implementation process of the project intervention. Stakeholder meetings informed the addition of variables on the mobile application that were otherwise initially omitted, which will further enhance the RMNCH electronic data collection for health information systems strengthening in Cameroon. Discussion: This study charts a direction that is critical in digital health delivery of RMNCH in a rural and low-income community and describes the important iterative stakeholder input throughout the study. The strategy of stakeholders' involvement in the BornFyne PNMS implementation charts a direction for ownership and sustainability in the strengthening of Cameroon's health information system.

Indexed as

Cameroondigital healthlow-middle income countriesRMNCHstakeholders

Identifiers

PMID37664872
PMCPMC10470631
OpenAlexW4385982119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.