Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664860›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Current status and progress in research on dressing management for diabetic foot ulcer.

Pingnan Jiang, Qianhang Li, Yanhong Luo, Feng Luo, Qingya Che, Zhaoyu Lu, Shuxiang Yang, Yan Yang, Xia Chen, Yulan Cai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
24.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pingnan JiangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Qianhang LiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Yanhong LuoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Feng LuoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Qingya CheDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Zhaoyu LuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Shuxiang YangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Yan YangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Xia ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Kweichow Moutai Hospital, Renhuai, Guizhou, China.
Yulan CaiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Zunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes and is associated with a high risk of lower limb amputation and mortality. During their lifetime, 19%-34% of patients with diabetes can develop DFU. It is estimated that 61% of DFU become infected and 15% of those with DFU require amputation. Furthermore, developing a DFU increases the risk of mortality by 50%-68% at 5 years, higher than some cancers. Current standard management of DFU includes surgical debridement, the use of topical dressings and wound decompression, vascular assessment, and glycemic control. Among these methods, local treatment with dressings builds a protective physical barrier, maintains a moist environment, and drains the exudate from DFU wounds. This review summarizes the development, pathophysiology, and healing mechanisms of DFU. The latest research progress and the main application of dressings in laboratory and clinical stage are also summarized. The dressings discussed in this review include traditional dressings (gauze, oil yarn, traditional Chinese medicine, and others), basic dressings (hydrogel, hydrocolloid, sponge, foam, film agents, and others), bacteriostatic dressings, composite dressings (collagen, nanomaterials, chitosan dressings, and others), bioactive dressings (scaffold dressings with stem cells, decellularized wound matrix, autologous platelet enrichment plasma, and others), and dressings that use modern technology (3D bioprinting, photothermal effects, bioelectric dressings, microneedle dressings, smart bandages, orthopedic prosthetics and regenerative medicine). The dressing management challenges and limitations are also summarized. The purpose of this review is to help readers understand the pathogenesis and healing mechanism of DFU, help physicians select dressings correctly, provide an updated overview of the potential of biomaterials and devices and their application in DFU management, and provide ideas for further exploration and development of dressings. Proper use of dressings can promote DFU healing, reduce the cost of treating DFU, and reduce patient pain.

Indexed as

DeafnessDiabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAmputation, SurgicalBandagesBlood PlateletsHumansbiomaterialdiabetic foot ulcerdressingprogresswound healing

Identifiers

PMID37664860
PMCPMC10470649
OpenAlexW4385981969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.