ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023
Integration of operator-validated contours in deformable image registration for dose accumulation in radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inverse-consistent deformable image registration to propagate biomechanical constraints for online adaptive radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-enhanced image registration for accelerating daily adaptive magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Segmentation regularized training for multi-domain deep learning registration applied to magnetic resonance-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Novel feature-based method for multi-modal biomedical image registration compared to intensity-based technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reconstructed dose and geometric coverage for tight margins using intrafraction re-planning on an integrated magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system for prostate cancer patients.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Dose-volume parameter evaluation of a sub-fractionation workflow for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy system.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Added value of non-rigid image registration for intrafraction dose accumulation in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Tools and recommendations for commissioning and quality assurance of deformable image registration in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Comparison of image registration methods in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated with superficial brachytherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- A multi-institutional comparison of retrospective deformable dose accumulation for online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-based automated segmentation and radiotherapy dose mapping for thoracic normal tissues.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is a core element of adaptive radiotherapy workflows, integrating daily contour propagation and/or dose accumulation in their design. Propagated contours are usually manually validated and may be edited, thereby locally invalidating the registration result. This means the registration cannot be used for dose accumulation. In this study we proposed and evaluated a novel multi-modal DIR algorithm that incorporated contour information to guide the registration. This integrates operator-validated contours with the estimated deformation vector field and warped dose. Materials and Methods: The proposed algorithm consisted of both a normalized gradient field-based data-fidelity term on the images and an optical flow data-fidelity term on the contours. The Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition was incorporated to ensure anatomically plausible deformations. The algorithm was validated for same- and cross-contrast Magnetic Resonance (MR) image registrations, Computed Tomography (CT) registrations, and CT-to-MR registrations for different anatomies, all based on challenging clinical situations. The contour-correspondence, anatomical fidelity, registration error, and dose warping error were evaluated. Results: The proposed contour-guided algorithm considerably and significantly increased contour overlap, decreasing the mean distance to agreement by a factor of 1.3 to 13.7, compared to the best algorithm without contour-guidance. Importantly, the registration error and dose warping error decreased significantly, by a factor of 1.2 to 2.0. Conclusions: Our contour-guided algorithm ensured that the deformation vector field and warped quantitative information were consistent with the operator-validated contours. This provides a feasible semi-automatic strategy for spatially correct warping of quantitative information even in difficult and artefacted cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.