Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664798›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

Integration of operator-validated contours in deformable image registration for dose accumulation in radiotherapy.

Lando S Bosma, Mario Ries, Baudouin Denis de Senneville, Bas W Raaymakers, Cornel Zachiu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lando S BosmaDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mario RiesImaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Baudouin Denis de SennevilleDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bas W RaaymakersDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornel ZachiuDepartment of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is a core element of adaptive radiotherapy workflows, integrating daily contour propagation and/or dose accumulation in their design. Propagated contours are usually manually validated and may be edited, thereby locally invalidating the registration result. This means the registration cannot be used for dose accumulation. In this study we proposed and evaluated a novel multi-modal DIR algorithm that incorporated contour information to guide the registration. This integrates operator-validated contours with the estimated deformation vector field and warped dose. Materials and Methods: The proposed algorithm consisted of both a normalized gradient field-based data-fidelity term on the images and an optical flow data-fidelity term on the contours. The Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition was incorporated to ensure anatomically plausible deformations. The algorithm was validated for same- and cross-contrast Magnetic Resonance (MR) image registrations, Computed Tomography (CT) registrations, and CT-to-MR registrations for different anatomies, all based on challenging clinical situations. The contour-correspondence, anatomical fidelity, registration error, and dose warping error were evaluated. Results: The proposed contour-guided algorithm considerably and significantly increased contour overlap, decreasing the mean distance to agreement by a factor of 1.3 to 13.7, compared to the best algorithm without contour-guidance. Importantly, the registration error and dose warping error decreased significantly, by a factor of 1.2 to 2.0. Conclusions: Our contour-guided algorithm ensured that the deformation vector field and warped quantitative information were consistent with the operator-validated contours. This provides a feasible semi-automatic strategy for spatially correct warping of quantitative information even in difficult and artefacted cases.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyConstrained motion estimationContour guidanceDeformable dose warpingDeformable image registrationPreconditioning

Identifiers

PMID37664798
PMCPMC10472292
OpenAlexW4386013410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.