Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664727›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Prediction and analysis of atmospheric visibility in five terrain types with artificial intelligence.

Chen-Wei Liang, Chia-Chun Chang, Chun-Yun Hsiao, Chen-Jui Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chen-Wei LiangDepartment of Biomechatronic Engineering, National Ilan University, Yilan, Taiwan.
Chia-Chun ChangDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chun-Yun HsiaoDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chen-Jui LiangInternational School of Technology and Management, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scattering visiometers are widely used to measure atmospheric visibility; however, visibility is difficult to measure accurately because the extinction coefficient decays exponentially with visual range according to the Koschmid's law. Moreover, models for predicting visibility are lacking due to the lack of accurate visibility observations to verify. This study formulated an artificial intelligence method for measuring atmospheric visibility in five topographical regions: hills, basins, plains, alluvial plains, and rift valleys. Four air pollution factors and five meteorological factors were selected as independent variables for predicting visibility by using three artificial intelligence models, namely a support vector machine (SVM) model, a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, and an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model. The GridSearchCV function was used to automatically tune model hyperparameters to determine the optimal parameter values of the three models for the five target areas. The predictions of the aforementioned three models underwent considerable considerably scale shrinking relative to observed values. The inappropriately low predicted visibility values might have been caused by the use of inaccurate observations for training. To solve this problem, formulas of scale ratio and downshift were used to adjust the predicted values. Statistical measurements of model performance measures by five quantitative methods (e.g., correlation coefficient, mean absolute error) showed that adjusted predictions were in strong agreement with the observation data for the five target areas. Therefore, the adjusted prediction has high reliability. Because of obvious differences in the topography, weather, and air quality of the five target areas, different models provided optimal predictions for different areas. In densely populated western Taiwan, the MLP model is most suitable for predicting visibility on hills whereas the XGBoost model is most suitable for predicting visibility on basins and plains. In eastern Taiwan, the SVM model is most suitable for predicting visibility on alluvial plains and rift valleys. Thus, the optimal prediction model should be identified according to the conditions in each area. These results can inform decision-making processes or improve visibility predicting in specific areas.

Indexed as

Air pollutantsExtinction coefficientFog-hazeKoschmieder's lawMachine learningTerrain effects

Identifiers

PMID37664727
PMCPMC10469964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.