ArticleHeliyon2023
Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for pattern-based classification system of cervical cancer from pathological sections.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reinforcement learning-based WSI diagnostic system for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- A quantitative analysis of artificial intelligence research in cervical cancer: a bibliometric approach utilizing CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multi-center research has demonstrated that adopting Silva's pattern-based classification system (SPBC) enhances the clinical prognosis and facilitates hierarchical management of patients with endocervical adenocarcinomas (EAC). However, inconsistencies in SPBC can arise due to variations in pathologists' experience levels. Thus, the implementation of standardized decision-making tools becomes crucial to enhance the practicality of SPBC in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: We enrolled a total of 90 patients with EAC in this study, of which 63 were assigned to the training group, and the remaining 27 were allocated to the validation group. To create and validate the prediction models for SPBC, we utilized a deep learning system (DLS) and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: In Silva pattern classification, ResNet50 achieved an average accuracy of 74.36% (63.64% for pattern A, 55.56% for pattern B, and 89.47% for pattern C respectively). Moreover, in test set, ResNet50 achieved an AUC of 0.69 for pattern A, 0.58 for pattern B, and 0.91 for pattern C. Conclusions: We successfully established a DLS for SPBC, which holds the potential to aid pathologists in accurately classifying patients with EAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.