Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664698›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Optimizing decision trees for English Teaching Quality Evaluation (ETQE) using Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimization.

Yingying Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yingying CuiFundamental Education Department, Tourism College of Changchun University, Changchun 130000, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in educational systems and English teaching strategies have increased the need for automatic methods for English Teaching Quality Evaluation (ETQE). A practical model for ETQE applies in different fields, determines the most relevant factors in teaching quality (TQ), and has optimal performance in different conditions. This paper presents a new method based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and meta-heuristic algorithms to solve the ETQE problem. The proposed method performs the prediction process in two phases: "determination of related indicators" and "quality prediction". During the first phase, after introducing a set of 24 candidate indicators, an optimal subset of them having maximum correlation with ETQE and minimum redundancy are selected using Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm. In the second phase of the proposed method, a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model optimized by ABC are applied to predict ETQ based on the indicators determined in the first phase. In this learning model, split points of decision nodes are determined by ABC in a way that the prediction accuracy would be maximized. The performance of the proposed method has been evaluated in two different teaching environments. The performance of the proposed method has been evaluated in two different teaching environments. The studied teaching environments are face-to-face (FF) and online classes that were held for middle school and university students, respectively. Based on the obtained results, the proposed method can predict the ETQ with an accuracy of more than 98.99% in both tested scenarios, which results in an increase of at least 1.11% compared to the previous methods. The efficiency of the proposed model in both studied scenarios prove the generality of this method to be used in real-world applications.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceLanguage teachingMeta-heuristic algorithmsTeaching quality

Identifiers

PMID37664698
PMCPMC10469990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.