ArticleOncology letters2023
Diagnostic value of MRI radiomics in differentiating high‑grade glioma from low‑grade glioma: A meta‑analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond binary classification: a pilot study of imaging-derived glioma severity modeling using T1-weighted and diffusion MRI radiomics.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- B7-H3 as a Reliable Diagnostic Biomarker for the Differentiation of High-Grade Gliomas (HGGs) and Low-Grade Gliomas (LGGs).Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography-Image-Based Glioma Grading Using Radiomics and Machine Learning: A Proof-of-Principle Study.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No clear conclusions have yet been reached regarding the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in distinguishing high-grade glioma (HGG) from low-grade glioma (LGG). In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the diagnostic value of MRI radiomics in differentiating between HGG and LGG, in order to guide their clinical diagnosis. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to November 2022. The search included studies in which true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative values for the differentiation of HGG from LGG were reported or could be calculated by retrograde extrapolation. Duplicate publications, research without full text, studies with incomplete information or unextractable data, animal studies, reviews and systematic reviews were excluded. STATA 15.1 was used to analyze the data. The meta-analysis included 15 studies, which comprised a total of 1,124 patients, of which 701 had HGG and 423 had LGG. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the studies overall were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of the studies overall were 7.89 (95% CI: 6.01-10.37) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.07-0.12), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio of the studies was 85.20 (95% CI: 54.52-133.14). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91. These findings indicate that radiomics may be an accurate tool for the differentiation of glioma grades. However, further research is needed to verify the most appropriate of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.