Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664604›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

A new staging system for postoperative prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Yuexiang Liang, Jingli Cui, Fanghui Ding, Yiping Zou, Hanhan Guo, Quan Man, Shaofei Chang, Song Gao, Jihui Hao

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prognostic value of albumin-bilirubin grade in patients with pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuexiang LiangDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.
Jingli CuiDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.
Fanghui DingDepartment of General Surgery, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730013, China.
Yiping ZouDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.
Hanhan GuoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Center of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China.
Quan ManDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.
Shaofei ChangDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.
Song GaoDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.
Jihui HaoDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has revised the definitions of T and N categories as well as stage groups. However, studies validating these modifications have yielded inconsistent results. The existing TNM staging system in prognostic prediction remains unsatisfactory. The prognosis of PDAC is closely associated with pathological and biological factors. Herein, we propose a new staging system incorporating distant metastasis, postoperative serum levels of CA19-9 and CEA, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular involvement, and perineural invasion to enhance the accuracy of prognosis assessment. The proposed staging system exhibited a strong correlation with both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, effectively stratifying survival into five distinct tiers. Additionally, it had favorable discrimination and calibration. Thus, the proposed staging system demonstrates superior prognostic performance compared to the TNM staging system, and can serve as a valuable complementary tool to address the limitations of TNM staging in prognostication.

Indexed as

Biological processCancerCancer systems biologyData processing in systems biology

Identifiers

PMID37664604
PMCPMC10469961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.