ArticleClinical kidney journal2023
Novel equations for estimating intraperitoneal pressure among peritoneal dialysis patients.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06060951 (To Investigate the Relationship Between Estimated Intraperitoneal Pressure and Non-infectious Peritoneal Dialysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
To Investigate the Relationship Between Estimated Intraperitoneal Pressure and Non-infectious Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)-Related Abdominal Complications
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children on peritoneal dialysis: a review and European practice survey.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Relationship between intraperitoneal volume and intraperitoneal pressure during peritoneal dialysis-a pilot study in adult patients.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Tunnel Infection and Peritonitis Induced byMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The prognostic values of estimating intraperitoneal pressure in the occurrence of abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients.Journal of nephrology · 2024Article
- Intraperitoneal pressure in peritoneal dialysis patients: a need for treatment individualization.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increased intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) is associated with abdominal wall complications and technical failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Since the standard measurement of IPP is limited due to its cumbersome procedures, we aimed to develop and validate equations for estimating IPP. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study with a total of 200 prevalent PD patients who were divided into development and validation datasets after random sampling matched by body mass index. The IPPs were measured using the Durand method, with whole-body and abdominal anthropometry indices collected. Equations with 2.0-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were generated by stepwise linear regression modelling. The bias, accuracy and precision of the estimated IPP (eIPP) with 2-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were compared with actual IPPs by the Durand method. The eIPP for the 2-L fill volume was also compared with other existing equations. Results: Two new equations incorporating waist circumference and height from the decubitus plane to mid-axillary line were generated. The eIPPs exhibited small biases in relation to the Durand method , with median differences of -0.24 cmH Conclusions: We provided two new equations developed from abdominal anthropometry indices to accurately estimate the IPP in the PD population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.