Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664560›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2023

Standard versus no post-filter ionized calcium monitoring in regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (NPC trial).

Peerapat Thanapongsatorn, Tanyapim Sinjira, Piyanut Kaewdoungtien, Prit Kusirisin, Win Kulvichit, Phatadon Sirivongrangson, Sadudee Peerapornratana, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Nattachai Srisawat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04792424 (No Monitoring of Post-filter Ionized Calcium in Regional Citrate Anticoagulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04792424 nacompletednot on this map

No Monitoring of Post-filter Ionized Calcium in Regional Citrate Anticoagulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorChulalongkorn UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsRegional Citrate Anticoagulation, Ionized Calcium, Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyArmsRegional citrate anticoagulation, Vasopressor, Antibiotic, Dialysis with continuous renal replacement therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peerapat ThanapongsatornDepartment of Medicine, Central Chest Institute of Thailand, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Tanyapim SinjiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piyanut KaewdoungtienExcellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prit KusirisinExcellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Win KulvichitExcellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phatadon SirivongrangsonDepartment of Medicine, Somdech Phra Pinklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sadudee PeerapornratanaExcellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuttha LumlertgulExcellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattachai SrisawatExcellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-8132
Chulalongkorn University · THKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend monitoring of post-filter ionized calcium (pfCa) when using regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy (RCA-CRRT) to determine citrate efficiency for the prevention of filter clotting. However, the reliability of pfCa raises the question of whether routine monitoring is required. Reducing the frequency of pfCa monitoring could potentially reduce costs and workload. Our objective was to test the efficacy and safety of no pfCa monitoring among critically ill patients receiving RCA-CRRT. Methods: This study was a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between January 2021 and October 2021 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand. Critically ill patients who were treated with RCA-CRRT were randomized to receive either standard pfCa monitoring (aiming pfCa level of 0.25-0.35 mmol/L), or no pfCa monitoring, in which a constant rate of citrate infusion was maintained at pre-determined citrate concentrations of 4 mmol/L with blinding of pfCa levels to treating clinicians. The primary outcome was the filter lifespan. Non-inferiority would be demonstrated if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in filter lifespan between the groups was less than 20 h. Results: Fifty patients were randomized to the standard pfCa monitoring group ( Conclusions: Among critically ill patients receiving RCA-CRRT, no pfCa monitoring by maintaining the citrate concentrations of 4 mmol/L is feasible. Larger randomized controlled trials should be conducted to ensure the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of this strategy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04792424 (registered 11 March 2021).

Indexed as

citratecontinuous renal replacement therapypost-filter iCa2+RCA

Identifiers

PMID37664560
PMCPMC10468745
OpenAlexW4362456700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.