Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664518›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

New methods for estimating the total wing area of birds.

Hellen Yi Fu, Michelle Su, Jonathan J Chu, Alexandra Margaritescu, Santiago Claramunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hellen Yi FuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Michelle SuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Jonathan J ChuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-494X
Alexandra MargaritescuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6184-4837
Santiago ClaramuntDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8926-5974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dispersal is a fundamental process in evolution and ecology. Due to the predominant role of flight in bird movement, their dispersal capabilities can be estimated from their flight morphology. Most predictors of flight efficiency require an estimate of the total wing area, but the existing methods for estimating wing area are multi-stepped and prone to compounding error. Here, we validated a new method for estimating the total wing area that requires only the measurement of the wingspan plus two measurements from the folded wings of study skin specimens: wing length and wing width. We demonstrate that the new folded-wing method estimates total wing area with high precision across a variety of avian groups and wing shapes. In addition, the new method performs as well as the old method when used to estimate natal dispersal distances of North American birds. The folded-wing method will allow for estimates of the total wing to be readily obtained from thousands of specimens in ornithological collections, thus providing critical information for studies of flight and dispersal in birds.

Indexed as

dispersal abilityestimationflight performancemorphometricswing area

Identifiers

PMID37664518
PMCPMC10474823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.