Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664513›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Effect of fuchsin fixation of pollen on DNA barcode recovery.

Melanie B Streicher, Steven D Johnson, Sandi Willows-Munro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melanie B StreicherCentre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Scottsville South Africa.
Steven D JohnsonCentre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Scottsville South Africa.
Sandi Willows-MunroSchool of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Scottsville South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-369X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollen grains attached to insects are a valuable source of ecological information which can be used to reconstruct visitation networks. Morphological pollen identification relies on light microscopy with pollen usually stained and mounted in fuchsin jelly, which is also used to remove pollen from the bodies of insects. Pollen embedded in fuchsin jelly could potentially be used for DNA barcoding and metabarcoding (large-scale taxonomic identification of complex mixed samples) and thus provide additional information for pollination networks. In this study, we determine whether fuchsin-embedded pollen can be used for downstream molecular applications. We evaluate the quality of plant barcode (ITS) sequences amplified from DNA extracted from both fresh (untreated) pollen, and pollen which had been embedded in fuchsin jelly. We show that the addition of fuchsin to DNA extraction does not impact DNA barcode sequence quality during short-term storage. DNA extractions from both untreated and fuchsin-treated pollen produced reliable barcode sequences of high quality. Our findings suggest that pollen which has been collected, stained, and embedded in fuchsin jelly for preliminary microscopy work can be used within several days for downstream genetic analysis, though the quality of DNA from pollen stored in fuchsin jelly for extended periods is yet to be established.

Indexed as

barcodingfuchsinITSpollen identification

Identifiers

PMID37664513
PMCPMC10468989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.