ArticleCureus2023
Knee Joint Rescue in a Traumatic Amputation With Coverage by a Fillet-Free Flap From the Amputated Leg.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Role of Free Tissue Transfers in the Preservation of Bone Length and Knee Joint Function after Lower Limb Trauma: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic amputation is a severe injury that requires urgent surgical care. A fillet-free flap from the amputated limb is the most conservative way to ensure proper coverage of the stump when replantation is not possible. We report the case of a male patient who suffered from a traumatic limb amputation in a motorcycle accident. A free fillet flap from the posterior compartment of the leg carrying the posterior tibial pedicle, the soleus muscle, and skin tissue harvested from the amputated limb was performed to cover the amputation stump and thus allow preservation of the knee joint. In our case report, the patient conserved almost maximal knee joint range of motion (130°). He regained the ability to walk only two months after the initial trauma. Prosthetic fitting occurred quickly and without any particular issues throughout the process. Regarding quality of life, after one year, our patient had a five-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) score of 21,221, and his 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) score was divided between the five components in 85 points in physical functioning, 100 points in role limitations due to physical health, 100 points in role limitations due to emotional problems, 50 points in energy/fatigue, 68 points in emotional well-being, 75 points in social functioning, 45 points in pain, and 95 points in general health. This technique helped provide good coverage of the stump while preserving a functional knee joint, allowing for effective prosthetic fitting in the future and therefore optimizing our patient's quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.