ArticleCureus2023
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer: Risk Factor and Predictive Model Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and risk factors for nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Pooled it
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
- Patient-Controlled Real-Time Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation at Neiguan (PC6) for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Single-Arm Two-Stage Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Trial
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Delayed Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Among Adult Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Review
- Symptom networks in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy and their impact on daily living status.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common and debilitating adverse effect of breast cancer chemotherapy. The incidence of CINV in the first cycle of chemotherapy is essential, as it sets the tone for anticipatory CINV and the overall patients' treatment experience. We aimed to investigate the risk factors of first cycle CINV in breast cancer patients and to develop a classification and regression tree (CART) model to predict its occurrence. Methods This is a cross-sectional study that nested in a prospective cohort. One hundred and thirty-seven female breast cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy were included. We used the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 to assess patient-reported nausea and vomiting in the first chemotherapy cycle. The proportional difference of CINV between sociodemographic and clinicopathologic variables was analyzed using chi-square, and the strength and direction of the relationship with CINV were analyzed using bivariable logistic regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression and CART analysis included variables with a p-value <0.250. Results The incidence of first-cycle CINV was 43.1%. The chi-square test revealed a significant association between insurance status and CINV (p<0.001) and between the stage at diagnosis and CINV (p<0.001). Underweight to normal body mass index (BMI) patients are significantly associated with an increased risk of first-cycle CINV (OR =2.17, 95% CI 1.03-4.56, p =0.041). In hierarchical order, three variables (stage at diagnosis, BMI, and age) were included in the CART model, which significantly influenced the probability of first cycle CINV. With an accuracy of 61.3%, the CART model had a sensitivity of 28.8%, a specificity of 85.9%, a positive predictive value of 60.7%, a negative predictive value of 61.5%, and an area under curve (AUC) of 0.602. Conclusion Breast cancer patients with an underweight to normal BMI have a higher risk of developing first-cycle CINV. Our CART model was better at identifying patients who would not develop CINV than those who would. The CART model may provide a simple and effective way to individualize patient care for first-cycle CINV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.