Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37664265›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Outcomes of Repeated Imaging After Initial Negative Radiological Localization.

Dilhara Karunaratne, Nisal Karunaratne, Rishi Vasanthan, Oluwamayowa Ojofeitimi, Emma Owens, Periasamy Sathiskumar, David Till, Paul Kirkland, David Howlett

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dilhara KarunaratneOtolaryngology, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, GBR.
Nisal KarunaratneOtolaryngology, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, GBR.
Rishi VasanthanOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, GBR.
Oluwamayowa OjofeitimiGeneral Internal Medicine, Conquest Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Leonards-on-Sea, GBR.
Emma OwensRadiology, Eastbourne Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR.
Periasamy SathiskumarDiabetes and Endocrinology, Conquest Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Leonards-on-Sea, GBR.
David TillEndocrinology, Eastbourne Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR.
Paul KirklandOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Eastbourne Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR.
David HowlettInterventional Radiology, Eastbourne Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR.
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiological localization imaging aids in the identification of abnormal parathyroid glands resulting in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), thereby facilitating minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. Sometimes initial imaging may fail to identify the abnormal gland and imaging may therefore be repeated. This study explored patient outcomes of repeated parathyroid localization imaging, after initial negative gland localization, at a United Kingdom institution. METHODOLOGY: Data was retrospectively collected and analyzed for patients with PHPT undergoing repeated imaging during a five-year period (2015-2020). The total number of episodes of scanning, types of scans performed, the time interval between scans and the imaging success of gland localization were recorded. We explored the reasons for repeated imaging and attempted to identify any factors that might predict subsequent positive radiological localization.

resultsA total of 45 patients were identified who underwent repeated localizing imaging after first localizing imaging was negative. Of these, 39 did not undergo surgery despite repeat imaging being undertaken; 11 out of these 39 patients (28%) had subsequent positive localization scans. Again, a large proportion of patients were managed conservatively, despite the repeated sets of imaging being done. Patients undergoing three or four sets of repetitive imaging did not have imaging or surgical success.

conclusionA streamlined parathyroid pathway should be followed whereby patients should be triaged for suitability for surgery prior to repeated imaging. A second set of scans should be offered when patients are unsuitable for conservative management and are willing and fit to undergo surgery. There is no merit to repeating imaging more than twice.

Indexed as

preoperative localizationprimary hyperparathyroidism (phpt)sestamibi scanspect-ctultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37664265
PMCPMC10474611
OpenAlexW4385548997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.