ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of benign gastrointestinal stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent as a Salvage Therapy for Corrosive-Induced Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Case Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Management of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers: Recent Trends and Advances.Cancers · 2026Review
- Concurrent stricturoplasty with lumen-apposing metal stents for gastrojejunal strictures after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gastroenterostomy for Benign Gastric Outlet Obstruction.DEN open · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided colorectal anastomosis using a lumen-apposing metal stent for complete anastomotic stricture.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Successful Treatment of a Benign Recurrent Colorectal Anastomotic Stricture With Creation of a New Colorectal Anastomosis Using Cautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Stents and Emerging Alternatives in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Lumen Apposing Metal Stents for Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Stricture Following Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- The Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagogastric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Approaches Beyond Endoscopic Dilation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Innovative Endoscopic Management of Recurrent Gastrogastric Fistula Post-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patient Using Cardiac Septal Occluder and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- A Successful 12-Month Trial of a Lumen-Apposing Self-Expandable Metallic Stent on a Benign Recalcitrant After Surgical Stricture.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Benign gastric outlet obstruction: evolving strategies from surgery to endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are an evolving option for the management of benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures. Multiple studies have reported on the efficacy and safety of LAMS for benign GI strictures, but were limited by their small sample size. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the critical role of LAMS for the management of benign GI strictures. Methods: A literature search of various databases from inception until October 2022 was conducted for studies evaluating the outcome of LAMS in patients with benign GI strictures. The outcomes assessed included technical and clinical success, adverse events including stent migration, and reintervention. Pooled event rates across studies were expressed with summative statistics. Results: A total of 18 studies (527 patients) were included in the present analysis. The pooled event rates for technical, short-term and long-term clinical success were 99.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.1-100.0), 93.9% (95%CI 90.7-100.0), and 72.8% (95%CI 55.7-90.0), respectively. The pooled incidence of adverse events and stent migration with LAMS for benign GI strictures was 13.5% (95%CI 8.6-18.5) and 10.6% (95%CI 6.0-15.2), respectively. The pooled event rate for reintervention with LAMS for GI strictures was 23.0% (95%CI 15.7-30.3). In a subgroup analysis focusing only on anastomotic strictures there was no significant difference in the pooled event rates for various outcomes. Conclusions: LAMS have a high technical and short-term clinical success rate, with an acceptable safety profile for the management of benign GI strictures. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate duration of stent therapy and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.